Points points points
Pages: [1], 2, 3
|
|
General
|
zzz1123

2008 Jun 8 • 127
|
Why do I still have zero points???????
1 sheep, 2 sheep, 3 sheep...zzzzzzzzzzz.
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
eDan Co. said: The integral of this function shows you the rate at which you piss off admins.
You mean the derivative and I'll say what I want thanks. Bloody admins.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited 2008 Oct 23)
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
The derivative does. But I will think about this... What the meaning of Points seconds would be.
Though; it is like asking what metres seconds means. It doesn't really mean anything, I don't think. (I don't mean metres per second.)
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
Rates generally run by time (SI seconds) so I figured I'd run with that. But that's the problem, I have no idea what the integral would mean if that were the case.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 15
|
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
Nah, this is the point! You have to integrate with respect to something; same for the derivative. The derivative is defined as a small change in one variable divided by a small change in another (where both changes are very very small). The integral is not as intuitive as that. So when you said "the rate you piss off admins" I assumed you meant the rate that points change with time. Therefore the integral of points would be, I dunno, actually, I fancy breakfast now.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 16
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
MY HEAD HURTS
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 16
|
|
|
Havokk Edge
Dingus (Part of the Wingus and Dingus set)


2007 Jun 24 • -9991
69 ₧
|
O_O mine dose too.
I molested my self last night.I said no but I knew i wanted it.
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
I feel horror when I see those who supposedly speak English as their native tongue mangle it horribly. Though that isn't a great sentence. I have noticed that as I see more and more spelling mistakes on the webernets I am starting to make those too! It is very annoying and embarrassing.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
Jet Monkey Duo
Reff Admin

2005 Mar 26 • 140
34 ₧
|
eDan Co. said: Because the sum of points you got take away the sum of points you lost is zero.
P = Pgiven - Ptaken
By looking at this basic formula, you can easily see that if there was no giving or taking, you will have 0 points.
The integral of this function shows you the rate at which you piss off admins.
Technically, I don't take away points, but rather add negative points. So:
P = Pgiven + Ptaken
And Ptaken is always negative.
It's a totally trivial difference, but I took 50 points from you anyway, eDan.
Brayor
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited 2008 Oct 17)
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
jrkookid
krcoolwhatever...guy

2007 May 27 • 821
30 ₧
|
Jet Monkey Duo said: eDan Co. said: Because the sum of points you got take away the sum of points you lost is zero.
P = Pgiven - Ptaken
By looking at this basic formula, you can easily see that if there was no giving or taking, you will have 0 points.
The integral of this function shows you the rate at which you piss off admins.
Technically, I don't take away points, but rather add negative points. So:
P = Pgiven + Ptaken
And Ptaken is always negative.
It's a totally trivial difference, but I took 50 points from you anyway, eDan.
omg ur back
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 17
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
eDan Co. said: I really do not appreciate that... I worked hard for all the point I earned. And adding a negative number is subtracting, by definition.
How very true. Axiomatically in the integers there are no statements made about subtraction of numbers, only addition. And succession.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited 2008 Oct 22)
2008 Oct 22
|
|
|
Havokk Edge
Dingus (Part of the Wingus and Dingus set)


2007 Jun 24 • -9991
69 ₧
|
Down Rodeo said: I feel horror when I see those who supposedly speak English as their native tongue mangle it horribly. Though that isn't a great sentence. I have noticed that as I see more and more spelling mistakes on the webernets I am starting to make those too! It is very annoying and embarrassing.
Im passing Spanish but failing English by 3 points.LEAVE ME ALONE!
I molested my self last night.I said no but I knew i wanted it.
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 22
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Admin Pupae


2007 Oct 19 • 2446
256 ₧
|
eDan Co. said: Why did an admin edit Rodeo's 1st post here?
They did? Confusing.
1 = 2 we hope that you choke
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Oct 22
|
|
|
|
|