|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 11
|
|
|
SRAW
Rocket Man

2007 Nov 6 • 2376
601 ₧
|
How does the stuff even move through each other??
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 12
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 12
|
|
|
SuperJer
Websiteman

2005 Mar 20 • 3883
|
It can move through itself because it is a mathematical object, not a physical one.
Or it is made of awesome little nanobots.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 12
|
|
|
the_cloud_system
polly pushy pants

2008 Aug 1 • 2971
-6 ₧
|
a black hole is sead to suck things up.
hawking brought up the discussion of "where does it go"
sense matter can not get destroyed or created, only converted.
your opinion?
Samuel adams, always the white choice.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 20
|
|
|
Rockbomb
Dog fucker (but in a good way now)

2009 Nov 13 • 2026
|
the_cloud_system said: a black hole is sead to suck things up.
hawking brought up the discussion of "where does it go"
sense matter can not get destroyed or created, only converted.
your opinion?
What do you mean "where does it go"?
I thought a black hole was just a huge ammount of mass in a relatively small space. Due to the mass the black hole has large amounts of gravitational pull, and when it 'sucks' stuff in the object is compacted and added to the black hole.
That was my understandings anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 20
|
|
|
the_cloud_system
polly pushy pants

2008 Aug 1 • 2971
-6 ₧
|
so it is to condense to make another big bang?
Samuel adams, always the white choice.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 20
|
|
|
SRAW
Rocket Man

2007 Nov 6 • 2376
601 ₧
|
Big bang is not really an explosion, but stuff from teh sup0r atom expanding creating space (liek wtf)
The dudes who made the big bang theory really suck, since they don't even explain what was before it.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 20
|
|
|
SRAW
Rocket Man

2007 Nov 6 • 2376
601 ₧
|
and black hole is just what rockbomb said, it's shitloads of mass in a small area, so there is a strong gravitation pull and not even light can escape it (which means light must have mass!)
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 20
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 21
|
|
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 21
|
|
|
|
|
sprinkles


2009 Sep 6 • 2545
10 ₧
|
Rockbomb said: I love how Sprinkles just jumped in and rephrased the post directly before him in attempts to fit in to the conversation 
I don't like this new kid. Douche bag.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 21
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited May 7)
2010 Oct 21
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
Time for more physics.
Let's say you have a miniature "gun" that fires electrons toward a screen. The gun creates a sort of 'spread' of particles, perhaps best thought of as a Bell Curve, if you guys know what that is. If you don't, it's easy enough to find out, and simple to understand.
So anyway, we're firing them at this screen, and we have this pattern. Then we do something clever: we put a barrier in front of this screen, leaving two small holes in it. What happens now?
If you're thinking "two piles, half the size of the first", you're wrong. Welcome to Quantum Mechanics. I'll make this a bit more clear later.
I give a little into the moment like I'm standing at the edge (I know)
That no-one's gonna turn me 'round
Just one more step, I could let go
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited 2010 Oct 26)
2010 Oct 26
|
|
|
SuperJer
Websiteman

2005 Mar 20 • 3883
|
I think you need more description or a diagram or something.
Are we to assume the electrons are fired from the gun, have some chance of either hitting the barrier or passing through one of the two holes, and then hitting the screen?
Also, if I know what you're getting at, shouldn't you be talking about a single electron, or a single electron at a time?
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 26
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
superjer said: I think you need more description or a diagram or something.
Yes, I do.
superjer said: Are we to assume the electrons are fired from the gun, have some chance of either hitting the barrier or passing through one of the two holes, and then hitting the screen?
Yeah, diagrams would really help here. But yes.
superjer said: Also, if I know what you're getting at, shouldn't you be talking about a single electron, or a single electron at a time?
Don't worry, we'll get there. Though you probably do know.
DIAGRAMS:
As Supers mentioned, there are lots of things you can do with this experiment. So, first of all we don't have the barrier, fire lots of electrons, and we end up with a pile of electrons that peaks in the middle. Then, we fire the electrons one at a time, ending up with the same distribution. We set it to fire lots again, and put the barrier in the way. There is a different pattern. What is it?
If we change the gun so that it fires the electrons such that only one is passing through the slit at a time, what happens?
I give a little into the moment like I'm standing at the edge (I know)
That no-one's gonna turn me 'round
Just one more step, I could let go
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 27
|
|
|
Mate de Vita
Kelli

2008 Oct 4 • 2429
159 ₧
|
Damn it, while trying to get what Quantum mechanics was about I accidentally found this:
Would it look something like the second picture?
...and that's the bottom line because Mate de Vita said so.
Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present, controls the past.
|
|
|
|
|
(Edited 2010 Oct 29)
2010 Oct 29
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 29
|
|
|
SuperJer
Websiteman

2005 Mar 20 • 3883
|
That's a cool picture Mata Va Data. I'd read about this before but hadn't actually seen it.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 29
|
|
|
SuperJer
Websiteman

2005 Mar 20 • 3883
|
Well the double-slit pattern looks like an interference pattern from the swarm of electrons going through both slits. So with just one electron, I wouldn't expect all the interference.
I wouldn't expect it...
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 29
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 30
|
|
|
Mate de Vita
Kelli

2008 Oct 4 • 2429
159 ₧
|
What kind of a detector? Does it stop the electrons or can they move through it?
...and that's the bottom line because Mate de Vita said so.
Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present, controls the past.
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 31
|
|
|
Down Rodeo
Cap'n Moth of the Firehouse


2007 Oct 19 • 5404
57,583 ₧
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Oct 31
|
|
|
|
|